Diagnostic Testing for von Willebrand Disease: Trends and Insights from North American Laboratories over the Last Decade.

Accurate diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) depends on the quality, precision, and variability of the laboratory assays. The North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA) is a provider of external quality assessment (EQA) for approximately 60 specialized coagulation laboratories in North America. In this report, NASCOLA EQA data from 2010 to 2021 are reviewed for trends in methodology and precision among various assays. In particular, recent ASH ISTH NHF WFH (American Society of Hematology, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, National Hemophilia Foundation, and World Hemophilia Federation) guidelines for diagnosis of VWD are reviewed in light of EQA data. In contrast to other geographic regions, laboratories in North America predominantly use three-assay screening panels (antigen, platelet-binding activity, and factor VIII [FVIII] activity) rather than four-assay panels (antigen, platelet-binding activity, FVIII activity, and collagen-binding activity). They also use latex immunoassays rather than chemiluminescence immunoassays, and the classic ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assay and monoclonal antibody (VWF:Ab) assay to assess VWF platelet-binding activity over newer recommended assays (VWF:GPIbM and VWF:GPIbR). Factors that may be influencing these North American practice patterns include lack of Food and Drug Administration approval of the VWF:GPIbM, VWF:GPIbR, collagen binding assays, and chemiluminescence methodologies, and the influence of the 2008 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines on laboratory practice. Lastly, systems-based solutions are urgently needed to improve the overall accuracy of laboratory testing for VWD by minimizing preanalytical variables and adopting assay standardization.

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: An assessment of the quality of testing in North American laboratories.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is complex. Reliance on laboratory testing can be problematic as different VWD screening panels, assays and methodologies can produce analytic variability in test results. OBJECTIVES: To compare the degree of imprecision among the VWD assays and within the platelet binding activity (PBA) assays, to determine the consensus among the VWD assays for correct classification of sample results, and to determine consensus among laboratories' von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer interpretations and final interpretations of the VWD panels. PATIENTS/METHODS: Proficiency testing results from the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA) submitted by laboratories from 2010 to 2019 for all normal, type (T) 1 VWD and T2 VWD samples were analysed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Imprecision was lowest for VWF antigen and highest for collagen binding activity (CBA) with median coefficient of variation (CV) of 12% (interquartile range (IQR) 7%) and 23% (IQR 21%) respectively. Within the VWF PBA assays, the gain-of-function mutant GP1b binding (VWF: GP1bM) methods had the least imprecision (CV 9%, IQR 10%). All assays, including the various PBA methods had excellent consensus. The majority of laboratories agreed that normal (median consensus-82%, IQR 16%) and T1 VWD (median consensus-100%, IQR 9%) samples had normal multimer distribution. Consensus among laboratories for final interpretations was excellent for normal samples (median 81%, IQR 8%), good for T1 VWD samples (median 59%, IQR 9%), and fair for T2 VWD samples (median 44%, IQR 21%). Consensus on final interpretation decreased as sample complexity increased.

Update on diagnostic testing for platelet function disorders: What is practical and useful?

INTRODUCTION: Platelet function disorders (PFD) are an important group of bleeding disorders that require validated and practical laboratory strategies for diagnosis. METHODS: This review summarizes the authors' experiences, current literature, and an international survey to evaluate the practices of diagnostic laboratories that offer tests for PFD. RESULTS: Blood counts, blood film review, and aggregation tests are the most commonly performed investigations for PFD and help determine whether there is thrombocytopenia and/or defective platelet function due to a variety of causes. The performance characteristics of tests for PFD, and the level of evidence that these tests detect bleeding problems, are important issues to determine where tests are useful for diagnostic or correlative purposes, or research only uses. Platelet aggregation assays, and quantitative analysis of platelet dense granule numbers, are tests with good performance characteristics that detect abnormalities associated with increased bleeding in a significant proportion of individuals referred for PFD investigations. Lumiaggregometry estimates of platelet adenosine triphosphate release show greater variability which limits the diagnostic usefulness. Diagnostic laboratories report that fiscal and other constraints, including a lack of high-quality evidence, limit their ability to offer an expanded test menu for PFD. CONCLUSION: PFD are clinically important bleeding disorders that remain challenging for diagnostic laboratories to investigate. While some PFD tests are well validated for diagnostic purposes, gaps in scientific evidence and resource limitations influence diagnostic laboratory decisions on which PFD tests to offer.

Diagnostic laboratory standardization and validation of platelet transmission electron microscopy.

Platelet transmission electron microscopy (PTEM) is considered the gold standard test for assessing distinct ultrastructural abnormalities in inherited platelet disorders (IPDs). Nevertheless, PTEM remains mainly a research tool due to the lack of standardized procedures, a validated dense granule (DG) count reference range, and standardized image interpretation criteria. The aim of this study was to standardize and validate PTEM as a clinical laboratory test. Based on previously established methods, we optimized and standardized preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical procedures for both whole mount (WM) and thin section (TS) PTEM. Mean number of DG/platelet (plt), percentage of plts without DG, platelet count (PC), mean platelet volume (MPV), immature platelet fraction (IPF), and plt light transmission aggregometry analyses were measured on blood samples from 113 healthy donors. Quantile regression was used to estimate the reference range for DG/plt, and linear regression was used to assess the association of DG/plt with other plt measurements. All PTEM procedures were standardized using commercially available materials and reagents. DG interpretation criteria were established based on previous publications and expert consensus, and resulted in improved operator agreement. Mean DG/plt was stable for 2 days after blood sample collection. The median within patient coefficient of variation for mean DG/plt was 22.2%; the mean DG/plt reference range (mid-95th %) was 1.2-4.0. Mean DG/plt was associated with IPF (p = .01, R2 = 0.06) but not age, sex, PC, MPV, or plt maximum aggregation or primary slope of aggregation (p > .17, R2 < 0.02). Baseline ultrastructural features were established for TS-PTEM. PTEM was validated using samples from patients with previously established diagnoses of IPDs. Standardization and validation of PTEM procedures and interpretation, and establishment of the normal mean DG/plt reference range and PTEM baseline ultrastructural features, will facilitate implementation of PTEM as a valid clinical laboratory test for evaluating ultrastructural abnormalities in IPDs.

Protein S testing in patients with protein S deficiency, factor V Leiden, and rivaroxaban by North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratories.

In 2010-2012, the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA) distributed 12 proficiency testing challenges to evaluate laboratory testing for protein S (PS). Results were analysed to assess the performance of PS activity, PS free antigen, and PS total antigen testing. Statistical analysis was performed on the numeric results and qualitative classification submitted for each method. There were 2,106 total results: 716 results from PS activity assays, 833 results from PS free antigen assays, and 557 results from PS total antigen assays. The three assay types performed well in the classification of five normal samples and nine abnormal samples, although certain PS activity methods were more likely to classify normal samples as abnormal and one PS total antigen assay was more likely to classify abnormal samples as normal. PS activity methods were affected by interfering substances such as heterozygous or homozygous factor V Leiden mutation (underestimation) and the anticoagulant drug rivaroxaban (overestimation). In conclusion, NASCOLA laboratories using a variety of PS assays performed well in the classification of clearly normal and abnormal samples. Laboratories performing PS activity assays should be aware of potential interferences in samples positive for FV Leiden or containing certain anticoagulant medications.

Use of the Optum Labs Data Warehouse to assess test ordering patterns for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in the United States.

We surveyed national Helicobacter pylori diagnostic testing practices and diagnoses using commercial and Medicare medical claims data from Optum Labs (Cambridge, MA). Serologic testing for antibodies to H. pylori remains the most commonly ordered diagnostic test despite recent expert recommendations. Changes in reimbursement for serologic testing will likely drive future provider ordering practices.

External quality assessment of platelet disorder investigations: results of international surveys on diagnostic tests for dense granule deficiency and platelet aggregometry interpretation.

The quality of platelet aggregation and dense granule deficiency testing is important for diagnosing platelet function disorders. After a successful pilot exercise on diagnosing platelet dense granule deficiency by electron microscopy (EM), the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA) has launched regular external quality assurance (EQA) for dense granule EM, as well as for the interpretation of platelet aggregation findings. EQA records were analyzed to assess performance. For EM EQA, between 2009 and 2011, there was excellent performance in distinguishing normal from dense granule-deficient samples and good (>70%) agreement on classifying most electron dense structures in platelets. For aggregation EQA, some normal variants were misclassified and overall case interpretations were more acceptable for rare disorders than for common findings. NASCOLA experiences with these EQAs indicate that there is a need to improve the quality of platelet disorder evaluations. For aggregometry interpretations, deficits in performance could be addressed by translating guideline recommendations into practice.

Approaches to investigating common bleeding disorders: an evaluation of North American coagulation laboratory practices.

Bleeding disorders commonly result from deficiencies or defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF), platelets, coagulation factors, or fibrinolytic proteins. The primary goal of our study was to assess current North American coagulation laboratory practices for diagnosing bleeding disorders, using an on-line patterns-of-practice survey of diagnostic laboratory members of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association. The survey examined laboratory approaches to evaluating bleeding disorders, with specific questions about the tests and test panels offered and compliance to recent guideline recommendations on diagnosing von Willebrand disease (VWD) and platelet function disorders. All laboratories responding to the survey performed a prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, an activated partial thromboplastin time, and coagulation factor assays, and many tested for VWD and platelet disorders. However, few laboratories had test panels that evaluated the more common bleeding disorders and few performed some assays, including VWF multimer assessments and assays for fibrinolytic disorders. Additionally, the cutoffs used by laboratories to diagnose type 1 VWD varied considerably, with only a minority following the National Heart Lung Blood Institute recommendations. In contrast, laboratories that tested for platelet function disorders mostly complied with aggregation testing recommendations, as published in the recent North American guidelines. Our results indicate that there are some gaps in the strategies used by laboratories to diagnose bleeding disorders that might be addressed by development of further guidelines and test algorithms that emphasize evaluations for common bleeding disorders. Laboratories may also benefit from guidelines on test interpretation, and external evaluation of their bleeding disorder testing strategies.

Critical values in the coagulation laboratory: results of a survey of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association.

Critical values are vital to safe clinical and laboratory practice. To address the lack of information on critical values in coagulation, pattern-of-practice surveys were distributed to members of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association. More than 70% of respondents had critical values for commonly performed tests. Median values were as follows: prothrombin time, more than 37 seconds; international normalized ratio, more than 5; activated partial thromboplastin time, more than 100 seconds; and fibrinogen level, less than 100 mg/dL. Critical value reporting generated a significant workload, with up to 15% of these tests yielding critical results. The median time to report critical values was 7 minutes for inpatients. Despite the lack of guidelines surrounding critical values in coagulation, this survey confirms that laboratories have reasonable and uniform practices. It also provides critical value medians and ranges for a wide range of tests. Laboratories without critical values or in the process of reviewing their values may find this survey of their peers useful.

Development of North American consensus guidelines for medical laboratories that perform and interpret platelet function testing using light transmission aggregometry.

Platelet function testing is important for the diagnostic evaluation of common and rare bleeding disorders. Our study goals were to promote best practices and reduce unnecessary testing variances by developing North American guidelines on platelet function testing. Guidelines were developed by consensus for expert recommendations (minimum level for approval, 70%) that included recommendations on the evaluation and interpretation of light transmission platelet aggregometry (LTA). To assess consensus, medical opinions on recommendations were gathered from diagnostic laboratories that perform LTA, in collaboration with the Quality Management Program-Laboratory Services (QMP-LS) in Ontario, Canada (10 laboratories), and the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA; 47 laboratories, 5 overlapping the QMP-LS group). Adequate consensus was achieved for all and 89% of recommendations for the QMP-LS and NASCOLA groups, respectively. The recommendations adopted provide North American laboratories with additional guidance on platelet function testing, including how to interpret LTA abnormalities.

Results of an external proficiency testing exercise on platelet dense-granule deficiency testing by whole mount electron microscopy.

Performance on specialized diagnostic tests for platelet disorders, including dense-granule deficiency, is rarely evaluated by external quality assessment (EQA). Members of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association that evaluate platelet dense-granule deficiency commonly use whole-mount electron microscopy (EM) methods. This observation led us to develop a pilot EQA survey with standardized EM images and clinical samples on grids from a healthy control subject and a subject with dense-granule deficiency. The survey participants were 8 centers, including 2 with no experience in platelet whole mount EM. All participants, including inexperienced sites, correctly interpreted findings for the normal and dense-granule-deficient platelets. Among experienced sites, agreement was excellent (>82%) on platelet structures to count or not count as dense granules. Participants indicated that future EQA challenges should include clinical samples on grids and standardized images. This is the first report that platelet EM can be assessed by EQA.

Comparison of coagulation factor XIII content and concentration in cryoprecipitate and fresh-frozen plasma.

BACKGROUND: For patients with plasma coagulation factor XIII (pFXIII) deficiency, recommended means of replacement include infusions of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP), cryoprecipitate, or (where available) factor (F)XIII concentrates. Quantitative differences in pFXIII concentration in FFP and cryoprecipitate are not well defined and were, therefore, the subject of this study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: FFP and cryoprecipitate (10 bags each from blood group O donors) were analyzed to quantify pFXIII activity and antigen. Coagulation FVIII, fibrinogen, and von Willebrand factor (VWF) were also quantitated. RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) pFXIII activity in cryoprecipitate and FFP bags was 60 +/- 30 and 288 +/- 77 U per bag, respectively, and pFXIII antigen and activity levels were concordant. Other comparisons (mean +/- SD) between cryoprecipitate and FFP, respectively, were as follows: coagulation FVIII activity, 133 +/- 37 and 265 +/- 83 U per bag; fibrinogen content (Clauss kinetic assay), 183 +/- 44 and 725 +/- 199 mg per bag; VWF antigen content, 181 +/- 53 and 218 +/- 70 U per bag; VWF ristocetin cofactor activity, 168 +/- 34 and 221 +/- 65 U per bag; VWF collagen-binding activity, 164 +/- 40 and 208 +/- 71 U per bag; and fluid (plasma) volumes per bag, 21.3 +/- 2.7 and 245 +/- 29 mL. CONCLUSION: In contrast to other cryoprecipitable coagulation proteins, pFXIII is only mildly enriched in cryoprecipitate when compared with FFP (approx. two- to threefold). Although both products can provide effective pFXIII replacement, FFP may be preferred when infusion volume is not a major consideration and pFXIII concentrates are not available. VWF is substantially enriched in cryoprecipitate (approx. ninefold compared with its concentration in FFP), with VWF activity content exceeding that of FVIII by approximately 26 percent on average.

Are laboratories following published recommendations for lupus anticoagulant testing? An international evaluation of practices.

Laboratory tests for lupus anticoagulants (LA) are commonly performed to evaluate thrombosis or suspected phospholipid antibody syndromes. To determine current LA testing practices, and if they conform to published recommendations, two questionnaires were distributed to clinical laboratory members of the North American Specialized Coagulation Laboratory Association (NASCOLA) and the ECAT Foundation (ECAT). The first and second questionnaires were completed by 113 and 96 laboratories, respectively. Commonly performed LA tests included the dilute Russell's viper venom time, LA sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time and hexagonal phospholipid test. Although some laboratories did single LA tests if requested, the majority complied with published recommendations: to use platelet poor plasma for LA tests; to use two or more screening tests, representing different assay principles, and one assay having a low phospholipid concentration to exclude LA; to confirm LA phospholipid dependency by the method giving an abnormal LA screen; to document the inhibitor activity on pooled normal plasma; and not to use phospholipid antibodies to confirm LA. A minority (<35%) followed the recommendations to exclude factor deficiencies and factor inhibitors as the cause of an abnormal LA test. After participating, 32% of laboratories had changed practices and 20% indicated that they would be changing practices. While most laboratories generally follow published guidelines for LA testing, few follow recommendations to evaluate for other coagulation abnormalities. Questionnaires may be helpful quality initiatives to improve compliance with laboratory testing guidelines and recommendations.

Molecular analysis in a patient with severe factor VII deficiency and an inhibitor: report of a novel mutation (S103G).

Congenital factor VII (FVII) deficiency is an autosomal recessive bleeding disorder with variable phenotypic correlation between FVII activity and bleeding risk. We report a novel mutation of the FVII gene that creates the amino acid change Ser 103 to Gly, which resulted in severe FVII deficiency with reduced FVII antigen. This mutation in the heterozygous form was also present in a mildly affected, unrelated patient. We also report on the natural history of an FVII inhibitor in the patient with severe FVII deficiency.

Posttransplantation thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a single-center experience and a contemporary review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the activity of von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease (vWF-CP) in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) complicating bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1, 1999, to June 30, 2001, allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was performed in 118 and 400 patients, respectively. We reviewed risk factors for development of posttransplantation TTP and measured vWF-CP activity during active TTP in 10 recipients. RESULTS: The incidence of TTP after allogeneic and autologous transplantation was 6.8% (8/118) and 0.25% (1/400), respectively. Among the allogeneic transplant recipients, the incidence of TTP after nonmyeloablative (NMA) PBSCT, matched unrelated donor BMT, and sibling BMT or PBSCT was 15.4% (2/13), 11.8% (2/17), and 4.5% (4/88), respectively. Of the 10 patients with TTP, 9 (90%) had received extensive prior therapy, including autologous transplantation in both NMA recipients. Acute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and methotrexate in most affected patients. The vWF antigen level was elevated in all patients, and no patients showed evidence of vWF-CP deficiency. During active TTP, 6 patients had grade II-IV acute GVHD, 1 had extensive chronic GVHD, and 4 had cytomegalovirus viremia. Risk factor analysis for development of TTP showed that transplant type (NMA and matched unrelated donor) and source of stem cells (bone marrow vs peripheral blood stem cell) were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Posttransplantation TTP was not found to be associated with severe vWF-CP deficiency. The elevated levels of vWF antigen are consistent with diffuse endothelial injury likely because of multiple interacting factors such as extensive prior therapy, GVHD, cyclosporine, and reactivation of cytomegalovirus. The disorder appears to be more frequent among patients with, or at risk for, acute GVHD, suggesting a possible role in the pathogenesis. Nonmyeloablative transplantation does not appear to confer a lesser risk, possibly for these reasons.